|
Kathmandu - Nepal and Rajauta Sugauli Treaty is 200 years old. Two hundred years ago, the then British before the Nepalese head bowed and the Mechi Mahakali Nepal had to lose ground. But after India became independent from Britain in 1 9 47 lost the terrain, Nepal Nepal Nepal's demand has been raised for decades. But the debate has not been a strong rise in national politics manner.
Capture
The treaty treaty lost ground back to be only the slogan of a campaign to Phanindra Nepal says, "China Hong Kong back to take the match, India goaa back, perhaps we should not match?" He once in power the political parties Sugauli Treaty lost land back the demands courageously to keep says.
Is presented, Greater Nepal Nepal Nepal envisioned Greater Nepal Nationalist Front, chairman of the national movement and conversation about the feasibility of Greater Nepal.
Nepal's internal nationality fragile situation of Nepal also lost about Greater Nepal telling you is, what did not and it phantusa?
There was not anything that we are not trying to be. Regaining lost ground to the provisions of us can be returned through the same 'campaign for greater political unity we have.
Nepal can be lost is the basis of the treaty, see?
The treaty would not have sandhimai point. But that treaty called the Treaty of Nepal was to leave the land should leave forever. But in 1816 signed the Treaty of Sugauli Nepal on March 4, 1816, less than a year, I'm sick of December 8 proposed to back the British Koshi gandakisammako Valley. Nepal's king accepted the offer made on 11 December 1818.
The treaty is the treaty say that it is not for ever, less than a year back also know that the process has been confirmed. Lucknow, India in 1857 is intended to suppress the Sepoy Mutiny in 1860, we made an agreement Junga support immunity vritisaharule back to the history of the Valley of the raptidekhi kalisammako is witness.
Military support to crush the rebellion after Britain Nepal some terrain that is found, still, upon Britain that we have to wear them? What policy should we have to take back lost ground?
There must be political consensus within the parties for Nepal. Vatican uthaunuparyo this. Being the subject of national debate, Pa ¥ it. Millions of people have said that mass uthairakheka government and the parliament should have the debate. But the debate has not been able to be where the debate. Sattasina nationality of vultures parties argue calaunuparyo own party, the government had to use discussion, the House was run. The debate did not escape anyone. After the debate angry that India did not care for that. But unfortunately, Nepal, India, who is interested in leadership nepalakobhanda are many.
You really can arise in power, the greater sattasina parties in Nepal to enjoy the agenda after this campaign, why did it have to drive?
For the nationality of the common Nepali people and their lost land are ready to fight back to take whatever it is clear that discouraged. But the state is run by the same parties bharatapaksiya not been able to find it ejendale priority. Front on behalf of our endeavor to repeatedly former Speaker Subhas mindset.
The treaty among 601 parliamentarians discussed the treaty to take back the land lost to delayed ¥ voice that we enjoyed it. But for them, afraid to discuss. Their courage should. Therefore, we can not say that screening occurred. Hong Kong back to China, perhaps, is the India goaa back, perhaps, to take back Macau, China can not be certain that we intend to take it back. Japan is also fed back to the land on behalf of Lomonosov.
Indonesia had been independent colonies as the Timor. There are many such examples. And not to conquer another land that always have many examples in the world. But in our country it is the who to ask, he is not blind. Nepali illustration mill has been a most Hato khaskhas said. First, as has been hostile bimda tatinubhanda griddle. Nepali people should now force the griddle, warm.
Nepal political parties no 'Greater Nepal' agenda could make, people have not even provide for the force, then all the odds, not only in India then?
It is self evident, that our leaders are, on the Immigration. Leaders of some political parties of unequal treaties and agreements with India should be repealed, says the measure is OK. The treaty Treaty is a list of the most unequal treaties must be a number, that you can speak for them, occurred. But a number of them is left in list 1 9 50 The treaty is the only thing to do. The treaty is not a treaty as different from any other. In 1 9 50 sandhikai Section 1 and 8 should be in the treaty called the Treaty that is written back lost ground. The termination of the treaty with Britain in all that is mentioned in the agreements. The treaty would also have had to tamamabhitra treaty.
The treaty that the treaty lost our land, we need to talk to the Britain in India, Nepal?
You made an interesting question. In fact, it is viewed as staged. In 1 9 47 to August 14, from Pakistan. August 15, became India. Vritisaharule aphaganistanadekhi ruled Sri Lanka, Indonesia, Bangladesh through India called barmasamma all of these. They became among people in Bangladesh in 1 9 71. Also other countries were free. The geo-parts disconnections and the process of Nepal to take their land was the situation. At that obligated belayatasamgai. In 1 9 47 August 15 in India and Sugauli Treaty became lost nearly all of the territory it indiyama Pa ¥. At that time, historians say that for a week or torn Darjeeling Pakistani flag. Since then, we can speak to us today with Britain.
We are an independent country. Our part of it is the colonies had us of why he went back to that question can be without. Indiyasamga also fought British colonialism 9 0 years, why the leaders of Nepal colonized ground? He upanivesaviruddha fight and another, making the colony? That India should be our question. This question is unable to keep the road we can not. Street pressure on the government to be created only. Road conditions may also be needed to create a great movement amdhibeheri. We talk about India we stressed to the government.
What if you do not leave the land of India to the UK. So belayatasahita ¥ tripartite talks to delayed it. We are including the United Nations and allow the international stage. Even if it did not go in running the international court may be. But we have not been able to speak with India alone. It had bilateral talks with India. If not we should have a tripartite dialogue. How can negotiations with Britain, India, Nepal and even asked that his hand went to left field chaunaum heard.
Britain, India, Nepal and Nepal tripartite discussion of this matter has not demanded. In 1 9 47 in Indianapolis, Indiana, as the Gorkha bhartipachi janalagiraheka britisaharu were, they needed the Gurkha Army. So they 1 9 47 November 9 in the tripartite treaty. The same sandhibatai Gurkha army was divided. Gurkha Army division to their own interests for the sake treaty was signed, but the land of India left hand. Similarly transfer the provision of settlement is not nowhere.
Jammuu-Kashmir, India and Pakistan for a long time for a small part of the terrain is disputed. Nepal went to the International Court of Justice if they get back to the land of India believe that can be done easily and?
The International Court of Nepal decided in favor of the C ¥, and its implementation is the responsibility of the United Nations cause. The world is not only India. After the decision of the International Court to say that the world public opinion to myself, to be accepted. International Court of Justice is to be guided in what was the world atheistic law. At that time, demolishing the implementation of the United Nations garaunetira growth that we are free.
Britain to leave India after an agreement with Britain, Nepal Nepalese land is the knowing who to blame him?
The government is to blame for the then Rana. Then Padma Mohan shumsher and can not take the pace was samaserale. In 1 9 4 9 in India and also in Nepal bhutanakobica Sugauli Treaty Just 1 9 50 on July 31, when the Nepal-India relationship is that could raise. India and Bhutan, India bhutanakobicako The treaty Treaty of 32 square miles of land has been returned. Even so still land Bhutan, India 'lijama is taking. Similarly, Nepal's office to ask the Britain to leave India after the territory was returned. It seems India is also despoiled.
The Ranas to talk about land that Tulsi Mehar Gandhian leader Mahatma Gandhi sent before. Mehr Gandhi said basil in this world land linasaknuhuncha topic. But .First he gave India the British cast with its Nepalese. After merging the Nepalis Nepalese guys expel the British to expel the jnarenti is that? Another diplomatic answer that. Tapaiharukai viruddhapani movement that Mahatma Gandhi can be taught. Rana told the same thing meharale basil. Rana was alarmed that. And that does not take the Ranas came to the land. Rana "are not not at bamboo flute 'vague way. In this context, as is the dastavejakai not discussed, but it is the history is.
Two hundred years after the Treaty of Sugauli British Prince Harry, the greater you a map of Nepal handed over, so Harry understood your message?
British Prince Harry wanted to meet with him, we are not listening to come. He met his private tour because we did not visit the table. So we are given a map of Greater Nepal British Embassy through Harry. The loss of the blame goes to the land of Nepal, especially Britain. Nepal lost land in the UK is also a moral obligation to return. He sent a message to the same reason that we are British rajakumaramarphata. We not only maps Greater Nepal, Sugauli Treaty also handed over a memorandum to us that we should be repealed.
Greater Nepal's campaign is full of your own lifetime believe that future generations are wondering transfer campaign?
See, now I am 56 years of the country. I feel that my lifetime is greater am Nepal. No assurance youth and dreams are not meant to share. Because we had lost the league would be lost. We have no hope and no treaty.
It was of course our chances of winning even. Only two fronts only five morcamadhye they won by deception. Three other fronts they distressed anywhere. The parties to a treaty, the party ceased. The party has been the party of the treaty if it remained a party to the treaty means not mentioned in the international law.
Nepal's political parties enjoyed by nationality is as pressing, we were not colonized anyone says, but it does not match what your essence?
The first thing we are leaders in history have we weave colony, we remain free to say that is wrong. People of Mechi and black colony was jaminaharu vritisa. So we guard colonial history that we have to take back the land that is expressed, then we are not to say that the history of tistadekhi kamgadasamma arrived.
Nepal is not angrejasamga war, Sugauli treaty did not bhannupa ¥ it. So one can not say that. Therefore, it is ¥ linupa Sugauli Treaty seriously. Second, the treaty called the treaty with Britain that we have. How the treaty with Britain laguhuncha India? The party ended in the treaty ceased. In 1 9 50 to October 30 an agreement with the Kingdom and Nepal is on track.
The treaty was not applicable when the treaty proves that the new treaty should now called. The Treaty also states in Article 8 The treaty is the treaty will be canceled. The treaty was also a treaty that Britain canceled, India and Nepal that canceled the treaty called the Treaty and also the right to the land that is the Deadlock not stay. Avoidance of treaty land has been unfortunate. So we need to land that is our demand.
So now do so?
The treaty called the Treaty of lost land to the subject of a resolution taken to the Legislative Parliament. India is the land which had been defended lidainaum bhandorahecha now see a time not so. Parliament took its conclusion can not be, the Constitution of India Article 1, 3 (c) in the 'land of India is considered India's only such land may be acquired in the bhumicahim India.
One of India's own land, the land acquired in the next India "that is mentioned.
|
|
0 comments:
Post a Comment